Police organization opposes bill to resolve surging statewide PTSD claims

Date:


A bill to resolve the surge of post-traumatic stress disorder claims by first responders statewide is in limbo in the face of steadfast opposition from a powerful police organization and uncertain prospects for a special legislative session this year.

The Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association (MPPOA), which has significant influence with the Republican lawmakers who control the Senate, says the bill does “not benefit those seeking treatment.”

The bill requires first responders to undergo treatment before they would be eligible for permanent disability pension benefits. PTSD is highly treatable, experts say, and supporters of the legislation say many police and fire personnel would recover sufficiently to return to work. Those still unable to work would be eligible for disability.

CHOOSE YOUR CHOICE GIFT CARD OFFER TODAY

The bill provides treatment for 24 weeks — with an option for an additional eight weeks — if health care professionals and the patient agree it’s needed. It would also pay the cost of medical insurance for first responders already receiving disability payments for PTSD, which is currently largely borne by cities and counties. The estimated annual cost to the state would be $25 million.

The bill’s supporters say it could keep police officers from quitting by providing education about PTSD on the front end and treatment programs to help heal those who develop PTSD and put some of them back to work.

MPPOA officials criticized the bill in a letter back in March, saying police wouldn’t get paid during treatment or be covered by medical insurance. The latest language clarifies that issue, providing for state reimbursement of cities and counties for treatment costs, wages and medical insurance.

Supporters say bill could help first responders, save money

Statewide groups that represent employers — including the League of Minnesota Cities, the Association of Minnesota Counties and the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association — support the legislation. They say it could help traumatized first responders and save millions of dollars in payouts by cities and counties for PTSD claims that are straining local budgets.

The payouts for workers’ compensation claims related to PTSD in Minneapolis have surpassed $23 million in the two years since the death of George Floyd. Meuser, Yackley and Rowland, the Eden Prairie law firm that says it represents 90% of PTSD claimants statewide, predicts Minneapolis could wind up shelling out $35 million.

“The chiefs are telling me we have to do something,” said Jeff Potts, executive director of the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association. He said the bill would pay “for people to get some treatment and avoid disability.”

Applications by police officers and firefighters for permanent disability under PTSD continue to flood the state’s pension system. There were 118 applications, mostly for PTSD, in 2019, 241 in 2020 and 307 in 2021. As of May 31, there were 118 applications so far this year.

With more disabled officers quitting and fewer police recruits, departments are shorthanded as “the pipeline of candidates has run dry,” Potts said.

“Everyone, including MPPOA, recognizes that the current situation is not sustainable,” said Matt Hilgart, government relations manager for the Association of Minnesota Counties

But the MPPOA has refused to back the legislation.

“That’s our biggest hurdle,” said state Sen. Jeff Howe, R-Rockville, a key supporter of the bill. “I think it is an educational process to get them on board, to trust it. … They are worried about losing a benefit, and we are actually trying to get them the access to more benefits.”

The bill’s advocates say they’ve been struggling to address the concerns of groups, including the MPPOA, since Howe and state Rep. Jamie Long, DFL-Minneapolis introduced the bill this year. It has since gone through nine revisions.

“We all identified the problem, which is the current system isn’t working well for either employers or employees,” Long said. “But there was a different level of commitment in trying to resolve the problem,” and the MPPOA “has been resistant about coming to the table to negotiate.”

“I am not really clear why an organization that represents police officers would not be supporting this legislation,” said state Rep. Cedrick Frazier, DFL-New Hope This legislation is designed to ensure that peace officers will get the mental health services they need.”

Still, Long and other lawmakers hope for tradeoffs on other issues relating to law enforcement that could lead to passage of the PTSD bill if a special session is called. Talks took place this week between members of Gov. Tim Walz’s administration and legislative leaders and committee chairs to see if they might strike a deal.

Despite revisions, still no backing from group

The original legislation would have required officers who have PTSD to undergo up to 32 weeks of treatment before they could receive workers’ compensation. Because of the complications of workers’ comp and the resulting criticism, legislators decided to drop the ties between workers’ comp and treatment. They rewrote the bill to say that officers must undergo treatment before becoming eligible for permanent disability payments through the state’s pension system.

The current bill reduces the length of treatment from 32 weeks to 24 weeks, with an option for an additional eight weeks.

Asked why MPPOA still opposes the bill, despite the revisions, spokeswoman Leslie Rosedahl cited the letter the MPPOA issued in March before the revisions occurred and an undated flyer signed by a coalition of law enforcement groups, including the MPPOA, that makes many of the same arguments.

“MPPOA and the coalition that opposed the [Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association] bill on the flyer, is still opposed to it,” Rosedahl said in an email on Friday. “There is disagreement that the issues are actually resolved, like the authors say it is.”

The Minnesota Professional Fire Fighters, which had opposed the bill, now generally supports it, said Scott Vadnais, the group’s new president. But he said he wants to see other employee groups come on board before his organization signs off on it. He did not say which groups, but he seemed to be referring to the MPPOA.

If the bill passed, the new system would go into effect July 1. Doug Anderson, executive director of the Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA), which administers the pensions, said he was concerned his agency wouldn’t be able to handle it properly if it takes effect so soon. Long, the bill’s sponsor, said the implementation date could be changed.

Anderson said he also worries that the bill lacks support from all sides.

“We want the employer groups and employee groups to be in sync on this,” he said. “If all that could happen now, that would be great.”

Anderson said that police and fire employees currently pay 11.8% of their wages into their pension plan and employers pay 17.7%. The plan is well funded, he said, but if investment returns are poor and the number of fire and police personnel continue to drop, it increases the likelihood the pension contributions of employees and employers may have to be raised in the future.

The Meuser firm is one of the bill’s staunchest critics — but Ron Meuser Jr., managing director of the firm, declined to say exactly what they’re criticizing.

“We have expressed our concerns with the various drafts of the legislation, and the authors of the bill are abundantly aware of the concerns we have,” he said.

Howe said it’s understandable the law firm would oppose the legislation because of the money they’re making off the settlements.

“When you talk to the Meuser [firm], they are the ones who stand to benefit if nothing changes,” Howe said. “They are the ones taking the money to the bank.”

Meuser denied Howe’s allegations.

“Every time the Legislature seeks to change or manage the statute, our revenues would increase,” he said, He called the bill “unworkable, poorly written and pushed by the League of Minnesota Cities to save money [with] no intent in actually helping those responders who suffer from the effects of PTSD. It is about saving money for the cities and counties.”

Anne Finn, assistant intergovernmental relations director for the League of Minnesota Cities, said the bill was drafted “with input from many stakeholders,” including the League.

“I would argue we are giving a new benefit for first responders,” she said. “The bill keeps people financially whole while they recover from a mental injury, and if they can’t return to work, they get the same benefits they are getting now.”

Walz will need to evaluate the bill’s language if it reaches his desk, press secretary Claire Lancaster said.

“The governor recognizes the staffing and financial strains resulting from this trend and is focused on his proposed public safety package that includes funding for law enforcement,” she said.

Staff writer Briana Bierschbach contributed to this article.



Source link

CHOOSE YOUR CHOICE GIFT CARD OFFER TODAY

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles

4th of July travel: When's the safest time to drive? – New York Post

4th of July travel: When's the safest time to drive?  New York Post Source link

Hopes high but expectations realistic as Whaikaha – Ministry of Disabled People launches

A new era for health and advocacy has arrived for people with disabilities with the launch of...

Internet Insurance Market Size, Share, Future Growth and Opportunity Assessment 2021-2027 – InsuranceNewsNet

New Jersey, USA -- (SBWIRE) -- 06/30/2022 -- Advance Market Analytics published a new research publication...